The E-Sylum v5#45, November 10, 2002
whomren at coinlibrary.com
whomren at coinlibrary.com
Sun Nov 10 19:50:42 PST 2002
Welcome to The E-Sylum: Volume 5, Number 45, November 10, 2002:
an electronic publication of the Numismatic Bibliomania Society.
Copyright (c) 2002, The Numismatic Bibliomania Society.
SUBSCRIBER UPDATE
Recent subscribers include Tom Whittle, courtesy of Brad
Karoleff, Cr. Gustavo Gil, courtesy of Jose-Luis Rubio, and
Rick Kay, courtesy of Andy Lustig. Welcome aboard! One
person unsubscribed, leaving us with exactly 500 subscribers.
Thanks for being with us at this milestone!
Tom Whittle writes: "I collect early half dollars, Canadian
tokens and souvenir cards. Jose-Luis Rubio notes that
Cr. Gustavo Gil is Treasurer of the Instututo Numismatico
del Uruguay.
NBS AT THE 2003 ANA MONEY SHOW IN CHARLOTTE
Howard A. Daniel III reports that he has received a letter
from Pete Smith, NBS President, approving him adding
NBS to the joint club table with Numismatics International
(NI) and the International Bank Note Society (IBNS) for
ANA Money Shows and Conventions. He writes: "The
joint table at the ANA Money Show in Charlotte for
March 21-23, 2003 has been confirmed by the ANA
Convention Department, so NBS will be there and you
can meet fellow members at it, rest between trips to the
bourse, etc. No one has yet applied for an NBS meeting
at Charlotte, so NBS members can meet at the joint
NI/IBNS meeting until and if one is arranged. If you want
any further information, please contact me at
Howard at SEAsianTreasury.com."
CONSIGNOR BARDEEN NAME SOUGHT
Gregg Silvis writes: "The May 7-8, 1929 Henry Chapman sale
of the Commodore William Colgate Eaton collection also
included the Bardeen Collection of half cents. Would anyone
happen to know the first name of Bardeen? Thanks!"
NUMISMATISTE
Hadrien Rambach of Paris, France writes: "About the
different & interesting words used for numismatics, I can
also suggest the French equivalents of "numismatist" (the
collector or scholar, interested in numismatics).
Nowadays, we French all use the word "numismate".
But another word did exist (still used, at least, in 1902):
"numismastiste".
In a letter, T.M. Dumersan explained that "numismatiste"
should be preferred to "numismate", because of the
differences between "diplomate" (the ambassadors, etc.)
and "diplomatiste" (the scholar in diplomatics). But this
argument is not good (I think), as diplomatics was created
after numismatics, and after the word "numismate".
Does someone know of an article or other research on
this subject (numismate vs numismatiste)?"
MUSEUM DISCUSSION CONTINUES
David Fanning writes: "My last word (promise) on the
question of curators and collectors: Larry Lee wrote in
his response to my comments in the previous E-Sylum that
"In regard to Mr. Fanning's statement that 'the odds are
good that the coins will end up unlabeled, unattributed
and stuck in storage somewhere,' I would opine that most
objects in museums, including coins, are in fact very well
organized, even if they may not be numismatically
attributed."
This, I think, cuts to the heart of the matter: if these coins
are not numismatically attributed, how then are they well
organized? According to what diagnostics or properties
are they organized? There are many knowledgeable
curators out there: I'm simply stating that most museums
do not have the resources to retain experts on staff and
that many collectors are at least as knowledgeable about
their field of specialty as are curators."
George Kolbe writes: "I, too, see merit in both Larry Lee
and David Fanning's arguments but it seems clear that in
practice, whether applicable or not, "archeological context"
often becomes an excuse for government confiscation.
And isn't the person who puts out his hard-earned cash
to buy a coin - or most anything else for that matter - likely
to be the better conservator? Or would you be likely to
pay the same for a car from Hertz or for one from the
proverbial old lady from Pasadena (I grew up in Pasadena
and I know MY preference)."
[When it comes to my own books, I hate to admit that I'm
not as good a conservator as I'd like to be. Several items
could use deacidification, some of the books sorely need
repairs or rebinding, and much of my ephemera collection
is a fun but unorganized mess. "Someday" I'll get around
to all of these things, but I hope "someday" rolls around
before I die.
Few of these items were purchased from collectors or
dealers; most were discovered in out of the way
locations, and in one case, I retrieved the items from
a home, working just steps ahead of a cleaning crew that
was instructed to toss all of the late owner's remaining
possessions into a dumpster. [a couple complete years
of B. Max Mehl's Numismatic Monthly were salvaged
from a tool box under a workbench in the basement.]
So in this case, the scavenging collector saved some rare
and unique items from certain destruction. Of course,
in this case, there was no accompanying archaeological
evidence to be saved.
The tug-of-war between curators and collectors has
gone on for many years. The following is taken from the
Vol 1, No. 1 (March 1905) issue of The Collector, a
Pittsburgh-based periodical on philately, numismatics
and archaeology:
"It occurs to me that so far as it could be accomplished
without infringing upon the rights of individuals, Museum
Curators should combine against dealers in archaeological
specimens. There seem to be two classes of these men
and the one should not be confused with the other. Of
recent years the the dealers of archaeological specimens
have increased to an alarming extent. If these men
confined their wares to surface-found objects or to
things procured from Tom, Dick and Harry, scientists
could have no just grounds for complaint."
The rant goes on for two pages and was to be continued
in the next issue. Alas, this is the only example of the
periodical I have. Has anyone ever seen this periodical?
The issue also has an article on large cents under the byline
"A. Cent" -Editor]
MINT PROCESSES SOURCE TRACKED
R. W. Julian and others reported the source of the
"Mint Processes" booklet described last week. As you'll
see, there is more than one "source".
Mark Borckardt writes: "Regarding Mint Processes of the
United States": On my desk is a copy of the 1896 Mint
Director's Report. Included, beginning at the bottom of
page 112 is an article titled "Mint Processes of the United
States" which includes exactly 15 black and white photos
along with articles by some of the same people mentioned
in the E-Sylum."
George Kolbe agrees: " I think the "booklet" you allude
to is derived from the 1896 Mint Report (see Kolbe sale
89, lot 914)."
Pulling the '96 Mint Report off my library shelf enabled me
to confirm the origin of my pamphlet. It must have been
some sort of offprint or reprint of that section of the Mint
Report. Paul Schultz suggested that since the pamphlet has
no identifying information, it may have been produced
as an in-house teaching tool as the U.S. Mint. Interesting
possibility.
The pamphlet, whose pages are numbered 3-39, seems to
exactly match the content beginning at the end of page 112
of the 1896 Mint report, and ending in the middle of page
157.
Dick Johnson takes the origin of the pamphlet back another
couple of years, and adds some color on why it was
produced. He writes:
"The 39-page pamphlet titled "Mint Processes of the United
States" is an offprint from the 1894 Annual Report of the
Director of the Mint. My notes on the Charles E. Barber
essay state these were pages 150-152 from that Mint Report.
The essays of other mint officials undoubtedly followed that.
This Mint Report covered the year 1893 since it was
published following the fiscal year which ended June 30,
1894. It is a nice thick volume in comparison with the other
Mint Reports which preceded and followed.
You have to understand what was going on in the Mint at
that time. In 1891 they had signed construction contracts
to build the most modern coinage mint in the world at 16th
& Spring Garden Streets (the so-called third mint in
Philadelphia).
What they wanted from each department head was an
analysis of what each department did in preparation for
planning the layout of the new mint building. I did research
on this era of the Philadelphia Mint's history in preparation
for a film (which was to be produced for this mint's
centennial by Mike Craven, but that project was abruptly
halted by the Mike's death in a senseless roadrage
killing on an L.A. expressway.)
I had found the blueprints for the Mint building, and
physically examined the building on every floor even to
the two-foot thick walls in the basement where bullion
and coin were once stored. (The building is now a
community college, but the name "United States Mint"
is still above the entrance of the original building.) The
old pressroom is now the library. The old walkway
where visitors could watch coins being struck now
houses study carrels.
The building embraced the first use of electricity for
running coining presses and other equipment. It had
elevators. It had telephones. It had water storage tanks
in the basement. It was the most modern coinage mint
in the world at the time (and they copied most of this
building for the Denver Mint build a few years later)."
[My library has a hole - I have the '93, '95 and '96
mint reports, but no '94. I'll put it on my Christmas
wish list. -Editor]
PRISON TOKEN BOOK PUBLISHED
Jørgen Sømod writes: "The prison employee's coin club in
Denmark has just published a booklet written by me,
"Fængselsmønter" (prison tokens). It includes 18th century
tokens from Norway and a 19th century token from Glückstadt
in present Germany. All types are illustrated and there are
also pictures of the different prisons. The book is of course
printed in a prison. All text is in Danish only. 32 pages. The
price is $ or 7,- sent worldwide." [For more information,
contact Jørgen at numis at vip.cybercity.dk -Editor]
CONTEMPORARY BRITISH COUNTERFEIT REFERENCE
Clement V. Schettino writes: "Even though I am not announcing
a hard copy book (yet) I thought it might be appropriate to
make this announcement here anyway. I am sure that I
correctly assume that many, if not all, of you are interested in
all publications dedicated to numismatic research and information.
I have recently created a few web pages
(http://www.geocities.com/copperclem/), and there are a few
pages dedicated to Contemporary Counterfeit British & Irish
1/2d & 1/4d
(http://www.geocities.com/copperclem/Counterfeits_page1.html).
On the last page you will see that I am offering for sale a CD of
my reference collection. If you have any comments or
information on this subject please email me privately at
copperclem at attbi.com"
WASHINGTONIA IN STACK'S AMERICANA SALE
In the Colonial Coins mailing list, Mike Hodder reported
that "Stack's 2003 Americana sale (next January) will include
some nice stuff in coins, medals, and tokens." One highlight
he mentioned is the "Western Reserve Historical Society's
collection of Washingtonia, with two gold funeral urn badges
(round and oval), two badges in silver (one a skull &
crossbones type), the fifth known WM piece with GW on
the pedestal, a Getz Masonic medal in sound VF, lots of
other neat stuff, much ex Norweb... The catalogue is being
written now. Look for it sometime around Xmas."
[The George Washington papers web site at the University
of Virginia has a great section on the death and mourning
of Washington. -Editor
http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/exhibits/mourning/front.html
]
VATICAN COLLECTIONS GOING ONLINE
Dick Johnson pointed out the following article, published in
Vatican City on October 29, 2002. It mentions the
Vatican Numismatic Library and a catalog of 300,000
coins in the Vatican collection.
"The Vatican Apostolic Library is in the process of posting
hundreds of thousands of historical manuscripts, previously
accessible to a privileged few, on its Web page."
"Manuscripts of Emperor Justinian, love letters of King Henry
VIII to Anne Boleyn, and missives of Lucrezia Borgia to her
father, who had become Pope Alexander VI -- all may be
consulted at www.vatican.va."
"Father Raffaele Farina, prefect of the library, talked about
the new features of the library's computer system. He
explained that since 2000, projects have been under way to
digitize and catalogue descriptions of the graphic material
(prints, illustrations and drawings) of the Print Library and
the numismatic material (coins and medals) of the Numismatic
Library.
In addition, he said, the database offers a public catalogue
which contains descriptions of books and magazines, prints,
illustrations, drawings, copper engravings, photographs, coins
and medals and even musical scores, recordings and CDs,
for a total of 700,000 bibliographic entries."
"The Vatican Apostolic Library, founded by Pope Nicholas V
(1447-1455), is specialized in humanistic areas (paleography,
history, art history, classics, philology) and has 1.6 million
ancient and modern printed volumes; 83,000 incunabula
(editions printed from the invention of the press to the start of
the 16th century), 150,000 manuscripts and archive volumes;
300,000 coins and medals, and more than 100,000 prints.
To give an idea of the quantity of the bibliographic material
in the Apostolic Library, Cardinal Mejía said the shelves to
store it would stretch about 90 kilometers (55 miles)."
http://www.mirifica.net/wmview.php?ArtID=280
MISSING DOTS: WHY?
Jose Luis Rubio, Telephone Token student and President
of the International Telephone Token Association writes:
"I would appreciate hearing from anyone who knows why
there is no period after the last abbreviation-letter of some
Telephone Tokens, like the Italian "S.E.T", the South
African "H.P.K" or most of the French products coined at
the Paris Mint House, that bear the classic abbreviation
"P.T.T" as at the classic 1937 token made in huge quantities,
and several phone-tokens made there for the French Colonies,
which also lack of the period after the last letter.
I strongly suspect that this period was not "forgotten" by
coincidence, but omitted for some special telephone cue...
My email address is: rubiojl at adinet.com.uy. Thank you."
GLASS-ENCASED COINS
Ed Krivoniak reports: "When I toured the Corning Glass
Museum in the late sixties I saw 2 or 3 examples of the type
of glassware mentioned by Mark Borchardt in last week's
E-Sylum."
BOOK INSCRIPTIONS: GOOD OR BAD?
Subscriber Nick Graver is the newest member of one of
my local clubs, the Western Pennsylvania Numismatic
Society. He and his wife were in town for our annual
Social Meeting on Tuesday. He sent the following note
the next day:
"I enjoyed E-Sylum, which was waiting for me upon return
to Rochester. It makes me wonder where all my numismatic
books went after Frank Katen sold them. I should have
had my name in each, just to give some collector an idea
where they originated. Of course, that would mark them,
and we were "drilled" in school to not deface books.
There is a topic for a future issue: "Books in "Mint" condition,
versus books having bookplates, autographs, inscriptions,
date received, and all the various entries that make them
interesting, but no longer "Mint" condition."
[This is an interesting topic. I've never put a bookplate in
any of my books, yet I do appreciate it when books come
to me with a bookplate or inscription noting where they've
been. When I've added books from notable collectors
(such as when I purchased the libraries of James O. Sloss
and Donald Miller) I made up slips of paper with the
previous owner's name and date of acquisition, and slipped
them into each book. I guess I'm of the same school as
Nick - I can't bear to place a mark on any of my books.
But a label of some sort, if it's small and unobtrusive,
would be a good way to indicate ownership. One exception
would be ephemera - when I see a one-page pamphlet
with someone's stamp or label on it I see red - what
buffoon would deface the item's only page with such
nonsense? What do our readers think? -Editor]
MILITARY "COINS"
An article on U.S. Army "Coins" appeared in the August 6,
2002 issue of The Wall Street Journal. With the latest U.N.
resolution on Iraq, the subject may become more topical.
Here are a few excerpts:
"Army Maj. Dave Daigle will never forget the first time he
was "coined." He had spent several weeks running a war
game in Germany 13 years ago when his colonel, Eric K.
Shinseki, now the Army's top general, gave him a small
bronze disk bearing the unit's insignia.
"That one was really special," says Maj. Daigle, who still
carries it in his wallet.
Maj. Daigle, who today is stationed at Fort Knox, Ky.,
still has that one, too, and 50 more. He got many of them,
he says, for just doing his job.
Napoleon observed in 1802 when he initiated the French
Legion of Honor that "it is by such baubles men are led."
These days, the U.S. doesn't have a lot of opportunities to
dole out combat ribbons and medals. So commanders are
minting commemorative coins, paid for with unit morale
funds, to reward the rank and file for everything from
putting in overtime to blasting "enemy" tanks in a training
exercise.
In the process they have triggered a full-fledged coin craze.
Today, just about every Army and Air Force command has
a coin."
"No one knows just when this practice began. The 10th
Special Forces Group, a cadre of Green Berets, first began
minting its own coin in the 1960s. It was one of only a handful
of units with a coin until the mid-1980s. With every passing
year, the coins have grown larger, flashier, and more plentiful.
Today's coins, which are typically about twice the size of a
silver dollar and weigh nearly 10 times as much as a quarter,
frequently have beveled edges and enameled reliefs of
exploding missiles, satellites and tanks. Some come in the
shape of dog tags or tank tracks."
"Last year, the Army, concerned that the coins were losing
their meaning, tried to rein in the craze... The proposal,
which needed congressional approval, caused an explosive
reaction. Soldiers flooded the Army Times, an independent
newspaper, with angry letters, saying their coins meant
more to them than service medals and ribbons."
On August 10, 2002, this letter appeared, correcting the
paper's incorrect use of the word "coin":
"In regard to your Aug. 6 page one story "Army Calling Cards":
It is the authorization of a government that makes a coin a coin.
Under Article I of the Constitution, the power to coin money is
expressly granted to Congress. The Oxford English Dictionary,
Second Edition defines "coin" as "a piece of metal (gold, silver,
copper, etc.) of definite weight and value, usually a circular
disc, made into money by being stamped with an officially
authorized device." The variously shaped pieces of metal
described in your article may be medals or medallions. They
may even be metal calling cards. They are not, however, coins.
Franklin L. Noel
Chief Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
District of Minnesota"
FEATURED WEB SITE
This week's featured web site is a history of military
"coining" on a commercial site for collectors:
http://www.militarycoins.com/history.html
Wayne Homren
Numismatic Bibliomania Society
The Numismatic Bibliomania Society is a
non-profit organization promoting numismatic
literature. For more information please see
our web site at http://www.coinbooks.org/
There is a membership application available on
the web site. To join, print the application and
return it with your check to the address printed
on the application. For those without web access,
write to David Sklow, NBS Secretary-Treasurer,
P.O. Box 76192, Ocala, FL 34481.
For Asylum mailing address changes and other
membership questions, contact Dave at this email
address: sdsklow at aol.com
(To be removed from the E-Sylum mailing list
send an email message with the word "Unsubscribe"
in the body of the message to:
esylum-request at binhost.com)
More information about the Esylum
mailing list